- The importance of follow-up with churches
- Follow-up: Making sure they get the Gospel right
- Follow-up: Urge them to grow in Faith, Love, and Hope
- Follow-up: Keep the Cross Central
- Follow-up: Keep Culture in Perspective
- Follow-up: Understanding Suffering
- Follow-up: Understanding Authentic Christian Ministry
- Follow-Up: Partnership in the Gospel
- Follow-up: Union with Christ
- Follow-up: Colossians – Avoid Syncretism
- Follow-up: Helping believers reconcile
- Follow-Up: Praying for Churches
- Follow-Up: Paul’s Prayer Requests
There doesn’t seem to be a lot of discussion on models of follow-up with churches once the church planter moves on. Church planters with denominational missions usually connect their new churches to some kind of organizational structure. This might be a national version of the denomination to which they belong. But non-denominational missions may not form any type of structure that would allow their church plants to relate to the founding organization or other churches. I have observed churches that were planted by one mission organization seeking help from another church planting organization. They did so because there was no structure that would connect them to other churches. It seems to me that some form of church-to-church relationship ought to be in place before the missionary moves on. Otherwise, these churches will feel abandoned when the missionary departs.
Paul’s deep concern for churches
In reading through 2 Corinthians recently, I was struck by Paul’s statement:
And, apart from other things, there is the daily pressure on me of my anxiety for all the churches. Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to fall, and I am not indignant?
2 Cor. 11:28-29 ESV
This intense ongoing “pressure of anxiety” for all the churches is part of Paul’s description of his sufferings as an apostle as seen by the context of this passage. This shows that Paul did not focus his ministry only on new areas to preach the gospel. He experienced “daily pressure of anxiety for all the churches.” He was deeply concerned about the churches he left behind. Eckhard Schnabel comments:
Paul’s missionary work was characterized by pastoral work in one location just as much as by “missionary travels.” Paul’s repeated visits to churches which he had established demonstrates the significance of his “anxiety for all the churches” (2 Cor 11:28) in his understanding of the missionary task.
Eckhard Schnabel, Paul the Missionary, p. 196.
In addition to Paul’s repeated visits to these churches, he left co-workers behind to strengthen them, he sent co-workers to troubled churches, and he wrote letters to churches expressing his concerns and giving instruction. Eckhard Schnabel points out:
. . . that Paul was not content to preach the gospel to unbelievers and to establish new communities of followers of Jesus. He continued to be concerned about the churches that had come into existence and about the believers who were meeting in those churches every week – concerned for their doctrinal authenticity and for their moral consistency, for their faith and their life, for their leadership and for the new converts. Paul is concerned that the teachers of the churches teach correctly and that believers in the churches believe correctly – this is why he writes his letters and why he discusses one-sided or misleading beliefs that some Christians propagate. He is not simply concerned about an authentic Christian “experience” but also about the truth of the gospel and about behaving in a manner consistent with the gospel (Gal 2:5,14).
Schnabel, Paul the Missionary, p. 207
Follow-up is important for missionaries
Follow-up is an important aspect of the missionary task. We need to follow-up with individual new believers. But we also must follow-up with churches that we or our colleagues have planted. A continuing relationship with new churches gives structure to our ongoing partnership in the gospel with these churches.
Today’s missionary does not have the apostolic authority that Paul had to correct false beliefs and practice. But we do have Paul’s authority in the biblical text. Both the missionary and the planted churches are subject to the authority of Scripture. Together we must submit to the Bible as the final and first authority for belief and practice. ‘
Paul’s NT letters express his “anxiety for all the churches.” In the coming months, we will be looking at those concerns in more detail in this blog series on “follow-up”. We will walk through Paul’s letters chronologically as he wrote them. In each letter, we will examine the concerns that Paul had for ongoing follow-up with these churches.
.
1 thought on “The importance of follow-up with churches”